Bryan Miller says "Ho Hum"

to pretend disinterest knowing they're going to lose.

And he brings up the usual PuSH'er lies of the NG = the militia, Miller = "collective rights", Right of the People = a privilege, "Assault Weapons" = Fully autos', scawwy .50 cals, etc.

Ho Hum indeed. Get some new material.

Update: Molonlabe notes that Bryan does some erasing and editing of his own:

Here's the real blatant lie by Bryan:

"In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use (of a firearm)...has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument."

What's with the (of a firearm) part? Lets see what it REALLY says:

In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less that eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument.

Miller addressed the defendant's right to own a sawed off shotgun, not a firearm in general.