
Only one more to go and then it's just down to improving the ones that are already on the books.
That sound you hear are Brady staffers working on their resumes. (Update: Well, what do you know? :) )
Welcome to the dustbin.

“Our streets need to be safer, and a concealed carry law would put first responders and the public at risk by allowing more weapons – hidden weapons – in public places."...The same nonsense trotted out before each and every other state passed CCW. Now just add one more reason Illinois is a laughing stock.
“In fact, by the time they get the gun out, it may well be too late. And to the extent they get the gun out early, they may well be causing pain and harm and damage to a family member,” Currie said.
CSGVDouble standards and dishonesty. Par for the course when trying to restrict civil rights.#Arizona responds to Tucson massacre by passing law to allow mentally ill to petition to buy guns again. #AZ #p2... http://fb.me/TjM5YNZQ
Three out of five of those guns were battlefield weapons that were outlawed here until the assault weapons ban was allowed to lapse in 2004.They were neither 'battlefield weapons' nor were they 'outlawed'. And the Times (should) know this. If they don't, they shouldn't be writing about it. If they do, they're lying.
How can you reason w/ a mentality like that? And this isn't just some off the wall individual, this is the voice of the organizations themselves.ProtestEasyGuns Protest Easy Guns
Is there anyone they DON'T have contempt for?CSGV CSGVMan running for seat held by Gabby Giffords shown holding assault rifles in ads, brags of being "warrior." #p2... http://fb.me/13U1FBrMU
To an early 21st century observer, it might seem that the militia-uses-onlyAnd unlike the gun control lobby, this historical research hasn't been funded by advocacy groups pushing a pre-determined conclusion.
view of the Second Amendment had always been predominant, and the Heller and
McDonald involved dramatic legal change. In full historical context, however, it
becomes apparent that those decisions recognize the individual rights understanding that had prevailed from the Framing onward. The militia-uses-only approach rejected in Heller and McDonald was in fact a very recent creation of the lower Federal courts, which had been subject to scholarly challenge almost from its
outset.