Sunday, May 2, 2010

Josh Horwitz is Upset

He doesn't like the fact that he's effectively been outed for using a sockpuppet so now he's trying to smear me by linking to my site over and over. (Note: Many of the Huffpo links no longer work as the comments have gone down the memory hole. Convenient, eh?)

I'm so hurt.

He states:
I can certainly see why you guys would smear Horwitz, and clearly the insurrectionist tag is well placed as far as you are concerned.
Of course this is coming from the same person that believes Chuck Norris is a traitor.

Josh GritsJr is also ignorant of basic law:
I'm interested in that militia you're a member of in Illinois, the one that you believe "the Founding Fathers a permanent force in lieu of a standing army and as a barrier against governmental tyranny."
Maybe 'GritsJh' should learn how to use Google.

IL Constitution. Art. 12:
The State militia consists of all able-bodied persons residing in the State except
those exempted by law.
The “militia” described here includes both the state’s organized militia who have
received military training, and its unorganized militia—composed of all other able-bodied persons who are not exempt.

Update: and over and over. This is what a breakdown looks like:
You guys running through the woods and shooting cut-out targets of Obama today?

Unorganized Militia Gear

Unorganized Militia Gear


Kurt '45superman' Hofmann said...

Oh--please don't send any web traffic my way!

RuffRidr said...

It's pretty funny that he is still trying to continue the charade.

Weer'd Beard said...

If they weren't stupid, they wouldn't be anti-gun!

Heh Man and to think these guys commanded our fear and respect not too long ago.

Seems kinda foolish these days.

Anonymous said...

Hey where can I get some of those cut-out targets of Obama?


kirk said...


I am pretty sure that Josh and his army of sock puppets can get them for you...

FatWhiteMan said...

There's a sockpuppet army?

Anonymous said...

It's pretty funny that he is still trying to continue the charade.

Not getting that, myself. We have hard-and-fast documented evidence that the person behind Username A is also the person behind Username B, and yet that person continues to deny, deny, deny.

I guess if you say it enough times, it must be true, right?