A few weeks ago, there was some discussion over the conniptions they were having over, get this, no guns allowed signs because they pictured... a gun. Because apparently they consider the general public to have an IQ somewhat lower than your average house plant.
“I think the general public will be alarmed by it and wonder if people have been allowed to bring guns to school in the past,” she added.Around the same time, the Bloomberg puppet group 'Mom's Demand Lovin'' and their half dozen IL 'members' got their knickers in a twist over an advertising sign equating firearms w/ American values. There's a poll asking if you hate the first amendment as much as they do.
The principal also suggested that a more “subtle” image be used, rather than a gun. Perhaps a “logo,” she said.
Now a household in a NC 'gated community' is being threatened w/ fines because some people have 'complained' about their sign:
Poor babies. Even the idea of a firearm 'offends' them. These are the same kinds of people that, when they were in college, would destroy literature from groups they didn't like and then wonder why they faced opposition for their 'progressive' ideals.
1 comment:
I wonder what they think about this eyesore:
http://gregcookland.com/journal/2012/07/24/john-rosenthals-anti-gun-violence-billboard-2/
Post a Comment