1st Coyote I've seen in this spot.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/266a4/266a483c423765b74614c6f041babcbb3ff1ad19" alt="Unorganized Militia Gear"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/feb91/feb91d8cd479f22490b61907ef6e03403867a8f7" alt="Unorganized Militia Gear"
Page Loads | Unique Visitors | First Time Visitors | Returning Visitors | ||
Total | 183,838 | 141,402 | 82,341 | 59,061 | |
Average | 504 | 387 | 226 | 162 |
What? Sorry, I don't get that one, Third or whoever you are.When I typed more slowly so she could follow along, she refused to answer. Shock.
I hate the 2nd Amendment! there, I said itI asked her if this was then representative of the BC's membership. Her reply:
I doubt very much that a BC member would say that. It might be somebody responding on the Facebook page to an article, etc but could or could not be a member of the Brady Campaign.Obviously she doesn't talk w/ gun control advocates very often.
Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence: of course there is still a loophole in some states if the internet seller is an unregulated "private" gun seller.When called on that they reply:
Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence: The driving-over to deliver loophole?So once called on their blatant BS, they move the goalposts and try and change the subject.
I saw a tv program showing anyone can order guns on the internet, inlcuding minors. There's a form, but it's also set up to enter a different mailing address.So this continues the trend that gun control advocates generally have no clue about firearms or the laws/regulations that cover them. We have their members, their FB IT guy and their board members (like Joan Peterson) regularly making completely fabricated claims and statements.
We hold that R.C. 9.68
is a general law that displaces municipal firearm ordinances and does not
unconstitutionally infringe on municipal home rule authority.