Not So Innocent 'Victims'; Little Chicago Cont.

So last week I posted video of another 'mob action' in the Charleston, IL Walmart. Two or three individuals were jumped by a larger group. According to reports, it stemmed from from an old dispute at their Chicago area high school.

A bunch of warrants are out the the ones involved and the victims?  Well, they're not innocent either.

At the residence hall, three women told police that three other women tried to force their way into the room and one sprayed one of the women in the room with pepper spray, the records say.
 Bolden and Brown are also among those listed as the alleged victims in mob action charges against the three people for whom warrants were issued in connection with the Walmart fight.

So the ones that got jumped, instead of letting their attackers take the fall, decide to double up on the stupid and assault them back in a college dorm using a weapon.  So now they're not only facing felony charges but being kicked out of school.  Every one of them needs to be kicked out of the town and sent back to Chicago where they can act like morons to their heart's content.

"People's Tribunal" for NRA? Yes, Please.

So a group of domestic terrorists and convicted murderers want the NRA 'Tried' in front of a 'People's Tribunal (which would most likely be made up of a collection of metrosexuals, panty-waists, mouth-foaming fanatics, and other ne'er-do wells).

I fully support this idea and think it should be televised, live-streamed, and propagated in every form of media there is. 

Then the entire population can see just how insane these people are, public admissions of their real goals, insults against firearm owners galore, AND the NRA has plenty of evidence for libel charges against the whole lot of them.

So please continue w/ this idea.

Code-Word Rant

Whenever one tries to discuss the increase in crime in the local area, it's shift from traditional 'rural' and 'college' crimes like B&E, burglary, etc. to more assaults, armed/strongarm robbery, etc, and the verified connection to the influx of Chicago area 'residents', some granola muncher invariable pulls out the race card w/ a comment like this:

After hearing this numerous times, my response is "F*ck You".  I'm glad you live in a world of Unicorns and Puppies prancing in the fields but I live in this nasty, despicable place called 'Reality". 

This is a place where the local towns are being used as dumping grounds for the homeless and drug addicted.  A place where the local university recruited poor, underpriviledged, inner-city youth. All of which are subsidized under various social programs. A select group of these, however, consider 'Section 8' housing to mean 8 families and have brought their families, friends, and associates w/ them.  
Then the domino effect.  As these individuals integrate into the community, their standing as urban thugs is interpreted as 'cool'  among the local kids and college suburbanites, getting them involved in their antics which have lately included several large scale fights, strong arm robberies, shootings, and increased, dangerous drug use. 

Slowly but surely, the headlines here are migrating into the same as Chicago.  Gang banging thugs w/ no respect for life dragging the quality of life down for everyone else and getting others hurt in the process.

So for those who think that all these are really just 'code-words' for racism, you can take your race-card and stuff it up where the sun don't shine.  If you want to play that game, it shows you really have no defense for your enabling of criminals.  What you will do, however, is blame the whole thing on lack of more social programs then move away to somewhere else and start the whole cycle over again.  

Two Tales of a Dindu Nuffin

As I mentioned yesterday, a completely legit defensive shooting in Chicago.  Of course the family of the criminal wants to get paid.

Oronsaye also said the shooter needed to be punished for killing a member of the community.
“You just took a brother, you just took a father from a lot of people. Somebody’s got to answer for that,” he said.

He's been watching too many movies and video games:

“Some people don’t actually know how to use guns,” Oronsaye said. “They go to firing ranges, but it’s not the same as a bullet going into someone’s body, it’s not the same as a bullet going into flesh. They should be able to wound first, kill next. He didn’t deserve to get shot multiple times.”

He's correct on one thing.  He has no idea how to use guns, except maybe aimed sideways.

 And the Washington Post makes up a story of a 'Halloween Prank gone wrong'

occurred on Halloween and involved a man in a mask with a fake gun
Was the shooting a Halloween prank gone horribly wrong?” he asks.

All the while talking up the criminal and denigrating the firearm owner.

The Chicago Sun-Times lists the criminal as a 'victim' w/ a subjective header:

 Suspected robber Reginald Gildersleeve was carrying a paintball gun when a customer with a concealed carry permit shot him to death in a grocery store on the Southwest Side, Chicago Police said Monday.

No mention of him threatening/assaulting the family.

Now how do the owners feel?  What do they think?

In a telephone interview Monday night, the store's co-owner, Pina Cabrales, said Gildersleeve worked with her at the store in 2011 and that over the years he would come in asking for money.
She said she last saw him Oct. 25 when he came in asking for cash and she gave him $20. He was in tears.
"I told him to take the money and never to return," she said. "I don't like to see anyone suffer, especially a man who is in tears."
When she heard that Gildersleeve had held a gun to her child's head, she felt betrayed.
"I see him as the angel God put here to protect my family," Cabrales said.

So this 'church-going', 'turning his life around' lifelong criminal gets his money cut off, then terrorizes the family that he had been 'close' too for so many years in order to steal from their livelyhood.  What kind of a person does that?

And acting the apologist for his actions will just enable more. 

CCW Violates Violent Criminal's Rights

So a completely legit self-defense shooting in Chicago.  The gun wasn't taken away from the license holder.  The police didn't come and ventilate him thinking he was the criminal.  None of the claimed missteps occurred.

Then there's this from an Asst. Prof. of Sociology.

No cares about the safety or due process of the real victims here.  The ones having their lives and livelihoods threatened.  That poor armed robber should have been given the benefit of the doubt.

I wonder if he would feel the same way if he were the one being robbed.

Some more 'enlightened' comments:

This one then goes on to create a bunch of those strawmen on what 'might' happen but didn't then declares gun owners a bunch of meanies for telling him off.

A few more:

This guy beats down a whole field of strawmen and denies he wants to disarm gun owners but keeps ranting on how dangerous they are.  "Some of my best friends are gun owners".  I almost died laughing. He eventually blocked me after claiming that the Supreme Court forced CCW on the rest of the states because of IL.  Yes, you read that right.

Advocates of violent criminals.  Gotta love 'em.