On another message board, there was a discussion about tests to allow for voting. Most supports went along the ideas of 'current issues'. I brought up, assuming a fantasy world of no bias, a basic gov't test similar to the ones we took in High School and which all immigrants need to take would, in my opinion, help make voting decisions more educated. This since not all issues are considered such across the board while the function of gov't is a universal.
After some discussion on how would this 'guarantee' improvement, a claim I never made, a very vocal opponent stated that voting for someone based off of liking what clothes they wear was, and I quote:
..as valid a reason as any other when you are exercising an absolute and unqualified right.
Barring the fact that voting is in no way an "absolute" nor an "unqualified" right (citizenship and not being insane or mentally retarded come to mind as just two 'qualifications' that are pretty universal) the idea that voting for someone because you think they're sexier than their opponent is equitable to understanding the issues and how they would affect society just plain scares the hell out of me.
Not that I'm really surprised that people think that way but that they'd announce and defend it.