‘If receipt of a firearms by the person would violate section 922(g)(10), any information which the Attorney General relied on for this determination may be withheld from the applicant if the Attorney General determines that disclosure of the information would likely compromise national security. In responding to the petition, the United States may submit, and the court may rely on, summaries or redacted versions of documents containing information the disclosure of which the Attorney General has determined would likely compromise national security.’.Get that? They don't have to provide ANY information to you or the courts they determine to be 'sensitive' and the courts have to rule on what is presented.
Guilty until proven innocent is what the Brady Campaign and all supporters of this bill endorse. So when you hear people like Ladd Everitt, Communications Director of the CSGV claim that people have Due Process if they're denied their right to purchase a firearm, they are lying.
Police state and the elimination of rights. What a 'fitting tribute'.
3 comments:
. . . the United States may submit, and the court may rely on, summaries or redacted versions of documents . . .
And remember what this Department of "Justice" is ready to submit, when offered the option of "redacted versions of documents."
Funny how "terrorism" and "national security" turns out to be the Feds trying to keep us in the dark about things they know we won't like.
Again, anti-freedom, not anti-gun!
Post a Comment