Now that the decision is closer, instead of replying to her many, many critics, pointing out the above, she instead reposts it pretty much verbatim except for adding a new emotional appeal by opening w/ the Kennedy assassination.
Just like Chicago's argument tried to repeat Heller, repeating a nonsense article doesn't make it any more a winner.
2 comments:
Fortunately for us, I doubt anti-rights advocates have yet come to terms with no longer controlling the message. For years, the media was only willing to accept their talking points, and the media was the only way to spread such things - if they repeated a lie enough times, it did become fact. But with the advent of the intertubes, that is no longer the case.
Slow on the uptake, they are.
Man, I had to check the first one, just to make sure that there actually are two pieces there. If the first one had been written by someone else, that someone else would have an airtight case to charge the author of the second one with plagiarism.
Post a Comment