Asked if she had read the evidence regarding a situation that's taken on a national scope?
“I did not, and that is not a concern,” --Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.)
She bases her decisions on her 'opinion' of the 'big picture' even though she openly refuses to educate herself on the facts behind them.
I'm sure she'll be re-elected.
2 comments:
As Rush Limbaugh used to point out on his program: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters."
It worked for them during the Clarence Thomas hearings and it seems to be working for them now.
Evidence doesn't matter to her or a lot of her counterparts...
Post a Comment