Over the past decade, I have watched gun-violence prevention fade from philanthropy’s agenda.There's a reason for that. It's because 'gun control', as they portray it, has no effect on crime. Crime was at its highest during the heyday of passing more, useless legislation while it decreased when this legislation went away and more progressive laws were enacted.
Causality? No.
But most groups realized that dumping $145K into he likes of Josh Sugarmann's pockets each year got them nothing but poorly written Huffpo screeds and 'reports' using Google searches.
The Joyce's realize that and are worried that they'll just keep dumping money into that pit so they'll use the Tucson shooting as long as they can before the media moves on to the next Lady Gaga outfit.
2 comments:
But I thought they had grass root support?
Are they saying that people aren't supporting their agenda?
"Over the past decade, I have watched gun-violence prevention fade from philanthropy’s agenda."
The fact that they were having the audacity to morph the phrase "gun violence prevention" into "gun prevention" and thereby clearly revealed their gun prohibition agenda might have also been a factor.
Post a Comment