“But we live in a complex word where you’re going to have to have a level of security greater than you did back in the olden days, if you will. And our laws and our interpretation of the Constitution, I think, have to change.”In other words, basically removing the Bill of Rights (except for him and his rich/connected cronies ). While he buys 3rd terms in violation of the will of the people, spends anonymous relaxation time in the Bahamas and has private (and public) security, the rest of us can do w/o those pesky freedoms like freedom of speech, self-defense, or security from illegal search/seizures.
All for our own good of course.
3 comments:
We know there are people who want to take away our freedoms. New Yorkers probably know that as much if not more than anybody else after the terrible tragedy of 9/11,” he said.
They should know it after "the terrible tragedy of" Bloomberg.
Good oint, Kurt...
"We won't let those nasty terrorists take away your precious freedoms....we can do it for you wholesale!"
Interesting that the bomber was hiding outside the cordoned-off area being searched house to house, and that only after the lockdown was lifted did Mr. Average Citizen spot the blood around his boat and bring the authorities to the perpetrator.
Meanwhile, how many homes were illegally searched at gunpoint by nervous State police with loaded guns, fingers on the trigger, threatening and terrifying innocent men, women and children in their own homes, "in a manner reminiscent of Genghis Khan", as our current SecState coined the phrase.
Kalashninkat
So...where's the ACLU on this unlawful search without probable cause, in direct violation of the Bill of Rights?
Where are our own repuglycan leadership on Massawhatsis declaring martial law over one injured fugitive murderer and locking down entire cities, throwing the innocent out of their homes at gunpoint?
Where are those famous Massatoosis lawyers, lining up to sue the State over the invasion of all those innocent and univolved homes?
Kalashnikat
Post a Comment