This is where it gets really entertaining:
By having a gun in the home the chances of someone living in the home being shot by that gun are far greater than a criminal getting shot with it. This is statistically proven.His 'evidence'? You guessed it. Kellerman. So I pound the hell out of him w/ actual numbers. His response? Not refuting any of this actual evidence but instead to call me a 'fanatic',compare me to a litany of other causes and ask me how many dead children I find acceptable before mandatory training is required for all firearm owners.
His answer. Zero. I then laughed at his lack of reality and he tried to change the subject from mandatory training which he earlier advocated to youth education like Eddie Eagle, child deaths included w/ adults, carrying v ownership, etc. All over the place.
His final response is typical. He took his ball and went home:
This has reached well beyond the waste of time point. You seem like the type that needs the last word. So I will be ignoring you now.Which he did and continues to spout his gun control endorsing statements: "I can't foresee the need for an AR 15 with a 100 round mag." while claiming he doesn't support 'gun bans.
This is the kind of uneducated twit that the Brady Campaing, VPC and CSGV Feed off of. I have no patience for them and will continue to tell them how stupid they are and what they're really doing for firearm rights.
UPDATE: Well it looks like 'Brent' removed the majority of his comments, specifically the ones where he parrots the gun control party lines and proves himself to be a true blue Fudd and 'Only One'. I guess he wasn't so confident in his expertise after all if he now chose to hide it from the world.