An article titled "Group questions NRA grant" has this quote:
It is a particular special interest group that has a special interest not in public safety but for arming people,"So right there she shows that she's not interested in 'good government' but in attacking a group she doesn't like. There is nothing the NRA could do that she would accept as positive.
And another article, "Well-intentioned small step to limit guns gets no help", talks about the recent attempt by the BATFE to enact multiple long gun reporting. No mention of 'Fast and Furious' or the fact they do not have the legal authority to do so. No and the author shows his irrational bias plainly w/ this:
That's old but sorry news for all of us who believe our public safety requires judicious gun-control reforms, especially surrounding the availability of military-style assault weapons that have no legitimate hobby or hunting use.'Judicious' like DC or Chicago. And 'no legitimate hobby or hunting use' is his preconceived opinion w/ no bearing in fact or reality. Just like above, no actual evidence of 'hobby or hunting use' will convince him because he's biased and he needs to keep his mind shut for his own sense of self worth.
This is what we're up against. Steel traps rusted shut.