In one of the current cases against local gun bans/restrictions,Wilson, et. al. v. Cook County, et. al., turns out the lawyers for the county were either ignorant or lying. Their brief misquoted the Heller and McDonald decisions, adding in phrases that don't exist in the decisions and changing their meaning. When this was pointed out to them, they blamed it on 'electronic errors'.
Yeah. OK.
"If I were a cynic," continued Pearson (ED of ISRA), "I'd suggest that these 'electronic errors' were just poorly executed attempts by the Cook County State's Attorney's office to re-write the Heller and McDonald decisions more to Mayor Daley's liking."
So basically the lawyers made some crap up, got caught and are now pointing fingers. And how many tax dollars are going to defend these regressive laws?
2 comments:
Reminds me of a certain lawyer with an ugly dog...
This brings up the usual question of, “What do these lying thugs who want to disarm us want to do to us after they have disarmed us?”
Being disarmed wouldn't be nearly as bad as what they would do to us after they disarmed us. Not having a weapon with which to defend one's self is bad, but being allowed to die in a government prison camp for the politically incorrect is much worse.
Gun prohibition cannot be allowed to occur for the simple reason that the evil character of those who crave it is plain to see. We would never want to be defenseless and at their mercy, ever!
Post a Comment