More Laws..*skritch*....More Laws...*skritch*....More Laws

So the Kansas workplace shooting didn't generate as much news splash as it commonly does. Obama didn't come out and say if he had another brother, it could be the POS.  There's been some chatter on the anti-gun pages but nothing like the dozens upon dozens of rapidfire posts we've seen before. 

Maybe this is why. 

  POS is a long time felon w/ a criminal record dating back 20 yrs.  

Court records show that Ford was a felon who previously lived in Miami and was on probation with a series of convictions in Florida, including burglary in 2000.

He had a criminal record stretching back to October 1996, when he was charged with carrying a concealed firearm when he was 18 years old, the records showed.

the stupid bint who spread her legs and bred w/ this jewel of society bought him the guns, knowing his criminal record.  She bought and redempted them from a pawn shop so went through background checks then handed them over to POS.  

Then he went on a shooting spree in a gun free zone less than two hours after getting an OOP against him. Now stupid bint is up on charges.  

Mostly we say "What law would have stopped POS from getting his guns.  Well the anti's have come up w/ a solution.  Violated more parts of the COTUS.

A bill is being pushed in Illinois that completely violates due process.  An 'Intimate partner' or police can file an OOP against a gun owner w/o their knowledge and strip them of their right to own a firearm.  The local police can then come and confiscate their guns.  All onus is put on the 'respondent' to prove their innocence, get their FOID back and recover their guns.  If the gun owner 'fails to respond' or 'can't be located', the police can keep the guns and do what they want w/ them.

Anyone see any chance of abuse of this one?