Paul crows about desperately needed new laws "for the children". Only ones exempt. And the study he uses to justify his ravings?
The National Firearms Study 2004 was supported by a grant from the Joyce Foundation to the Harvard Injury Control Research Center.
Of course both of Paul's proposals (mandated safe storage and 'authorized user' sensors) are either A. complete violations of the 4th amendment and/or B. so reliable that neither the police nor military want them.
But it's for the children (tm) so obviously we must pass these laws, no matter how inane or ineffective.
1 comment:
"for the children". Only ones exempt.
I think someone should ask the Brady Bunch why they don't care about the lives of LEOs' children.
Post a Comment