The DC Brief is in and they still can't tell the truth.
the majority invalidated D.C. Code § 22-4504(a), which requires a license to carry concealable weapons in the District, seemingly on the theory that it eliminates respondent’s right to use hand-guns for self-defense in his home. However, licensing laws ensure that only law-abiding, competent individuals have access to dangerous weapons...
Nonetheless, the majority concluded that section 22-4504(a) functions as a complete ban on using handguns for self-defense at home because one cannot obtain a license for a handgun.
So they're saying that they feel there are no law-abiding, competent individuals residing in DC. They must have been talking about Congress.
My favorite:
Third, handguns cause accidents
They "Cause" them? Idiots.
These are the "reasonable regulations" that the Brady Campaign supports. If knuckle-draggers like me can pick their brief apart this easily, they're hurting worse than we thought.
No comments:
Post a Comment