So a completely legit
self-defense shooting in Chicago. The gun wasn't taken away from the license holder. The police didn't come and ventilate him thinking he was the criminal. None of the claimed missteps occurred.
Then there's
this from an Asst. Prof. of Sociology.
No cares about the safety or due process of the real victims here. The ones having their lives and livelihoods threatened. That poor armed robber should have been given the benefit of the doubt.
I wonder if he would feel the same way if he were the one being robbed.
Some more 'enlightened' comments:
This one then goes on to create a bunch of those strawmen on what 'might' happen but didn't then declares gun owners a bunch of meanies for telling him off.
A few more:
This guy beats down a whole field of strawmen and denies he wants to disarm gun owners but keeps ranting on how dangerous they are. "Some of my best friends are gun owners". I almost died laughing. He eventually blocked me after claiming that the Supreme Court forced CCW on the rest of the states because of IL. Yes, you read that right.
Advocates of violent criminals. Gotta love 'em.
3 comments:
Due process, much like detached reflection, cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife.
Due process is a legal concept anyway, to be argued in a courtroom, not on the street.
What a hilariously twisted viewpoint. Please god none of these people are legislators.
I got a nosebleed just reading the liberals and their twisted logic.
Post a Comment