They need another newsworthy shooting and a few more of Bloomberg's millions to get their numbers back up.
Some of the comments on Politico lamenting this :
Wouldn't it be awkward if LaPierre met the same fate as Chris Kyle while holding a live news conference? W O W - that's the day I write the NRA a big, drippy check.
For the NRA and it's supporters, it is. They view the tiniest amount of agreement with regulation advocates as complete and total surrender. The stack of bodies will never pile high enough to change that.
For the NRA and it's supporters, it is. They view the tiniest amount of agreement with regulation advocates as complete and total surrender. The stack of bodies will never pile high enough to change that.
3 comments:
What happened in 1999 to change the narrative? Gun rights were losing up to that point. Not that I am unhappy about it. I just don't remember a watershed that changed peoples perception of gun rights.
"The stack of bodies will never pile high enough to change that."
That's because we've read history, we know where their road leads, and we have no burning desire to become part of the "stack of bodies" that the collectivists desire to create.
It's not paranoia if your enemies really are out to get you. It's not fear mongering when crime still exists and the government spies on its own people, targets those who disagree with it, arms its police with hand me down military gear, and gives a pass to rioters/looters/Occupy scum.
It's funny, but I don't see in the Constitution that our rights are subject to compromises and infringements.
They forget that they never give; they only take with every single gun control law.
So, I am to misbehave.
My triad battle-cry:
Molon Labe!
Never Again!
I Will Not Comply!
Post a Comment