With uninformed people like that you could probably get them to say anything needed banned. "Do you believe military-style aperture sights should be banned?"
"Good heavens! That sounds scary! No civilian should own one of those."
@alcalde: Dude, what are you waiting for? Grab your camera and start asking the stupidest gun questions you can think of. It'd be hilarious.
"Representative McCarthy, whose husband was brutally murdered by a gun while he was on his way to work wants to ban barrel shrouds on assault weapons. According to her, barrel shrouds are "the shoulder thing that goes up." Do you support her banning "the shoulder thing that goes up?"
5 comments:
I watched it twice. There were 9 people, 8 stated that they were not gun owners (one "absolutely not!") and one wasn't asked on camera.
These guys are terrible propagandists. What they needed was 10 gun owners saying how much they wanted all guns to be sold with background checks.
Imagine,
"Do you play baseball?"
"no"
"Should metal bats be banned in Little League?"
"Yes"
They'd get laughed at.
With uninformed people like that you could probably get them to say anything needed banned. "Do you believe military-style aperture sights should be banned?"
"Good heavens! That sounds scary! No civilian should own one of those."
@alcalde: Dude, what are you waiting for? Grab your camera and start asking the stupidest gun questions you can think of. It'd be hilarious.
"Representative McCarthy, whose husband was brutally murdered by a gun while he was on his way to work wants to ban barrel shrouds on assault weapons. According to her, barrel shrouds are "the shoulder thing that goes up." Do you support her banning "the shoulder thing that goes up?"
Hilarity ensues.
Sean, you mean "...brutally murdered WITH a gun..." , right?
@Sendarius: I said it that way on purpose. I was deliberately using their language.
Of course your wording is the correct one. Guns don't have free will.
Post a Comment