The views expressed by me in this blog do not represent any group with which I am associated but are rather my own personal opinions.
Well that's perfectly reasonable, right? Sure, until she also said this:
If any elected leader wants to know why they should not believe what they hear from the NRA, Mike is a prime example of the type of hyperbolic rhetoric that should not be considered valid in this "discussion".
So she, as a leader of a group, can express her opinion freely and it should not be regarded as part of her organization but any and every statement made by individual members of the NRA (about 4 million) should be considered representative of the goals and beliefs of the NRA as a whole.
Ya know, I really don't think that's the way it works.