A former soldier who handed a discarded shotgun in to police faces at least five years imprisonment for "doing his duty"...
Prosecuting, Brian Stalk, explained to the jury that possession of a firearm was a "strict liability" charge – therefore Mr Clarke's allegedly honest intent was irrelevant.
Just by having the gun in his possession he was guilty of the charge, and has no defence in law against it, he added.
Here's the money quote though:
"The intention of anybody possessing a firearm is irrelevant."This is the end result of 'gun control' as endorsed by IANSA of which the Brady Campaign and numerous Joyce Foundation groups (among other organizations) are members.
This is their goal here with their UN 'treaties'.
That is their goal while supporting 'reasonable' and 'common-sense' gun restrictions that restrict no-one but those who try and follow the law like the
Anyone who denies that this is their goal in the face of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary is either fooling themselves or supporters.
There are no other options.
6 comments:
I agree the guy is getting a raw deal and the goal is obvious but he could have handled this better and probably avoided this.
Even as gun friendly an area as I live, were I to find a weapon tossed into my yard, I would call the police WITHOUT touching it and do so immediately not the next day. Last thing in the world I would want on that weapon is my finger prints.
Lovely. ...which is why we have to keep our guns now.
Anyone heard of "shall not be infringed"?????
Spencer
Words fail me.
Makes me want to air drop a boat load of Jennings onto the Queen Mums' palace.
wtf
I am thinking they may be better off going BACK to a monarchy.....it is apparent they cannot think for themselves anymore..... :)
"Comments on this story have been disabled for legal reasons" Even funnier.
Post a Comment