Ban Ownership

It's only "reasonable".

• Mandatory waiting periods to purchase a gun

That have never been shown to reduce gun violence.

• Requiring citizens to actually register their firearms

So the Gov't knows where they are when they decide to ban them (CA, NY, NJ, DC, Chicago, Etc.)

• Mandatory micro stamping of guns to aid tracing weapons

A process that has been found to be useless in solving crimes.

• Banning inexpensive handguns that make it easier for criminals to acquire

So only wealthy people can own firearms? They never commit crimes, do they?

• Limit gun purchases to one gun a month

So you can end collecting.

• Require training for gun owners

So only the Gov't can decide to make training so onerous, no-one, including police, could pass.

• Restrict gun ownership to citizens 21 and older

So you can vote, join the military, drive, etc. , but not protect your family?

• Eliminate right to carry concealed weapons

So restrict people who don't commit crimes?

• Ban gun shops from operating within 5 miles of a school

Why, if they can't own guns anyway? Are "gun shops" dangerous?

• Ban resale of police firearms which include high powered assault weapons

Why? What is a "high powered assault weapon"? Can you provide a definition?

• Ban high capacity ammunition magazines that are often used by gang members in drive by shootings and not needed to kill a deer

You mean like in the Henry Varmint express? They're "often used by gang members"? How many rounds are actually fired?

Read the rest. The usual histrionics and outright nonsense.

Via ArmsandtheLaw.