Within the first few sentences, he contradicts himself:
The Constitution says it is "to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions." It is confusing, therefore, to conclude that the Second Amendment - with its explicit militia purpose - might somehow provide individuals the right to mount an armed insurrection against the very law and order that the militia was designed to defend.
There is no Second Amendment right to treason.
It's for when the Government is no longer following the Constitution is when the populace, by the very intention of the Founding Fathers, is morally, ethically, and legally allowed to rise up.
Paul continues w/ his completely unsupported myth that the militia was "governmental military institution".And he claims we fabricate things.
No comments:
Post a Comment