tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544914688307073747.post502306854338776792..comments2024-02-05T11:03:17.462-06:00Comments on Days of our Trailers: The @CSGV and 'Conspiracy Theories'Thirdpowerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02886910076400873900noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544914688307073747.post-29285998504367323792011-06-29T09:36:21.529-05:002011-06-29T09:36:21.529-05:00Let's call for a list of dangerous, anti-Ameri...Let's call for a list of dangerous, anti-American organizations that are seeking to subvert the Second Amendment rights of ordinary American citizens, so that those organizations can be "administratively" shut down and not allowed to operate as long as they're on the list. Then we can sit back and let Laddy make our arguments for us.<br />Throwing away due process can cut both ways. Ladd might not think it's such a great idea when it's poised to cut off his paycheck.<br /><br />The perfect countermove to the anti groups' threat to our Second Amendment rights is to threaten their First Amendment rights. We'd merely need to use their own arguments, "not an unlimited right", "reasonable restrictions are reasonable", "common sense regulations are needed common sense". Then they can make our arguments in favor of freedom for us. It would be amusing to hear them contradicting themselves by supporting freedom and opposing it at the same time. They are wrong to oppose freedom, and that is something that can be demonstrated by forcing them to defend their own freedom, which they are abusing by abusing us.Chashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10966720423575333937noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544914688307073747.post-62974686009529354632011-04-19T19:15:06.835-05:002011-04-19T19:15:06.835-05:00Hey, Star Chamber courts are perfectly acceptable....Hey, Star Chamber courts are perfectly acceptable. It's a 'court' after all.Thirdpowerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02886910076400873900noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544914688307073747.post-78980097123039779862011-04-19T16:33:28.225-05:002011-04-19T16:33:28.225-05:00Ladd can talk all he wants about "judicial re...Ladd can talk all he wants about "judicial review," but every version I've seen of this kind of legislation, like Lautenberg's S. 34, <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s112-34&version=is&nid=t0%3Ais%3A70" rel="nofollow">allows the Attorney General's office to redact any information</a> that <i>they</i> determine "would compromise national security," thus giving them the power to make it absolutely impossible to effectively contest the "suspected terrorist" designation.<br /><br />The "judicial review," is, in other words, rendered moot.Kurt '45superman' Hofmannhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14091930034162667742noreply@blogger.com